Solution Panorama
Industry Trends
Business Challenges
Business Challenges
-
High Costs in DR Center Builds and O&M
To build a traditional DR center, enterprises need to build or rent equipment rooms and invest lots of manpower in maintenance and testing. Accomplishing a full DR mode incurs high CAPEX and OPEX as the arms of both or multiple centers must reach the same scale and achieve near real-time transmission.To build a traditional DR center, enterprises need to build or rent equipment rooms and invest lots of manpower in maintenance and testing. Accomplishing a full DR mode incurs high CAPEX and OPEX as the arms of both or multiple centers must reach the same scale and achieve near real-time transmission. -
Many Restrictions on DR Drills
If a DR drill is performed in a traditional DR center, equipment rooms and cables need to be scheduled, and some cold standby devices need to be powered on, which causes a high fault rate. Switchovers may delay or even fail at the critical moment in spite of the drills, leaving the enterprise vulnerable with weak service recovery capabilities.If a DR drill is performed in a traditional DR center, equipment rooms and cables need to be scheduled, and some cold standby devices need to be powered on, which causes a high fault rate. Switchovers may delay or even fail at the critical moment in spite of the drills, leaving the enterprise vulnerable with weak service recovery capabilities.
-
Complicated Data Synchronization Policies
The synchronization policies for hosts, databases, and storage devices are complicated and restricted by the transmission distance and data volume. In addition, the data encryption/decryption mechanism complicates deployments and maintenance. As a result, some data becomes invalid, or the system cannot meet the designed RPO.The synchronization policies for hosts, databases, and storage devices are complicated and restricted by the transmission distance and data volume. In addition, the data encryption/decryption mechanism complicates deployments and maintenance. As a result, some data becomes invalid, or the system cannot meet the designed RPO. -
Architecture Difficult to Implement
Core services require multi-center architectures to ensure service continuity, requiring large amounts of investment and extensive consideration in design as to how all the parts of the architecture will collaborate. Implementing this architecture with a traditional DR model equates to high costs and the benefits are limited.Core services require multi-center architectures to ensure service continuity, requiring large amounts of investment and extensive consideration in design as to how all the parts of the architecture will collaborate. Implementing this architecture with a traditional DR model equates to high costs and the benefits are limited.
Typical Scenarios
-
Cross-Cloud Backup
-
Cross-Cloud DR
-
On-Cloud DR
Introduction
Cost-Effective and Secure Enterprise Backup Solution
Benefits
Introduction
HA Public Cloud DR Center
Benefits
Application layer: multi-cloud architecture and multi-cloud connections switchover
Virtualization layer: data synchronization supported by the ecosystem cooperation solution
Database layer: replication software of mainstream databases, such as Oracle and MySQL
Storage layer: asynchronous replication of Huawei storage arrays to HUAWEI CLOUD Dedicated Enterprise Storage Service (DESS)
Introduction
Intra-City DR Capability with RPO = 0
Benefits
Recommended Configurations
Solution Advantages
Recommended Services
Success Stories
Success Stories
-
With multi-AZ deployment, intra-city active-active DR, remote DR assurance, and visualized DR GUI, Huawei helped Vmall enhance the service availability and simplify O&M. Vmall can now easily cope with seckill, hacker attacks, and high O&M costs.
-
Local IDC+ Hybrid Cloud Disaster Recovery from Huawei reduced DR costs and shortened the project construction period. With this solution, BRC can now implement cross-AZ DR and perform DR drills at any time.